🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours before the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – going beyond who would win citywide, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in the city, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become something of a well-known figure recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious while missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in readership and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

How was your election night?

It was necessary because they were adding approximately 200K votes into the tally every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous initially: Mamdani led the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of votes that came in after that and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world in which yesterday went somewhat badly for Mamdani, where the opponent would have essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But Mamdani gained half a million votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, young, renters and people struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president last year backed the progressive now. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the night was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought it could exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s favored to surpass 50%. He has just over 50% but there’s still probably 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not certain, but I think probable, and I wish he achieves it because afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any area. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added all of these conservatives on the island who had a high participation. I think occurred significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it before Trump endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

I think there was some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and homeowners all went for Cuomo. So there existed a little resistance. However no, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on whether the candidate was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if there were major surprises here, but Mamdani did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – people will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that every city in the US can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities we face.