🔗 Share this article

As the struggling Tories gathers in Manchester for its yearly gathering, it has a lot to reflect on regarding its next steps. There is uncertainty if a road forward exists at all. We are in tough times for a governing group that now has almost nothing, if anything, fresh or distinctive to say to the public.

An Alternate Reality

Things could have turned out so different if concrete steps had been made on an priority that resonates with people nationwide: Equal opportunity. However the previous administration hadn’t got the basic understanding on how to convert the trendy talk on social mobility into concrete action. During the initial period after the general election, it discussed what the phrase actually signified.

I found it bizarre, because I had previously explained to Johnson what social mobility meant when we originally talked about it during the contest for party leader. This terminology was a term I developed and used at the education ministry to talk about equal opportunity. This became our guiding principle, and its meaning is clear: levelling up is the method by which we achieve equality of opportunity – without removing opportunity away from those who are already advantaged, but rather by extending options to those that are without.

Fundamental Idea

The other key DfE phrase we used, “potential is equally shared around the UK, but opportunity is not”, represented another a intentional wording, reflecting the two halves of a fairness agenda. To begin with, ability distributed uniformly but not nurtured uniformly through our education system. Second, chances not distributed fairly by employers or our economy. Thus, learning and employment were essential to achieving stronger social mobility. This was an mission about the societal structure of our country – supporting human talent and providing access to opportunities.

The Reality of Implementation

How did the social mobility agenda evolve into under the previous government? A towns fund administered out of the the relevant ministry. Street beautification and redeveloped traffic systems. An official policy document was launched a significant period after the Prime Minister took office, which saw ongoing initiatives relabelled under the recently branded agenda.

Consequently, a wider fairness strategy went unpursued, as well as all the change that it might have driven – in funding, business, economic policy, tax and in place-making. Additionally, in education, including a higher education sector that has become a scapegoat for politicians of all stripes – even though it remains the strongest driver of life improvement for youth from modest backgrounds, personally, this country has had over the past 30 years. Perhaps the primary source of equal opportunity, operating at scale.

The Role of Ambition

Aspiration is vital for our country to prosper. To foster ambition, there needs to be a realistic expectation that dedication and outcome are linked; that if people aspire, they can attain. For political leadership, being able to foster a outlook of positivity about the years ahead is important. Analysis by the academic institution at Bath University and others, recently released, showed that the ministry’s focus zones I established during my tenure – locally targeted strategies to enhancing learning results – led to young people in those areas being up to nearly one-fifth more optimistic about their prospects than those in similar areas without these initiatives in place. The evidence is clear: just making an sincere effort on pro-social mobility policy can rapidly and effectively change how people feel about their prospects.

Lost Potential

Oblivious to this, and in the middle of its successor selection process, in September 2022, the ruling party terminated the programmes. Why should any person in those communities vote for a political group that took that action? This specific initiative is a clear case of what might have become a transformative administration strategy on social mobility, but that opportunity was hopelessly squandered. Approaches such as this can create belief and drive. Conversely, as the Conservatives found out, breaking the promise of fair chances is the biggest blunder any leadership can make. The public penalized the administration for its ineffectiveness but, above all, for its unfulfilled commitments on social mobility.

Today’s Political Reality

Currently the mandate on equal opportunity and fair access has passed to a opposition party. The previous terminology has been abandoned. The new government has its own policy language of “eliminating hurdles to advancement”. The organization that is gradually replacing the struggling Tories, the challenger, also has its own message – “industrial revival”. It’s a phrase to talk about new opportunities in areas like the one I was raised in, in the region. It promises that an industrial past can revive into an revitalized economy.

For voters, it must appear as a Groundhog Day-style loop. Similar challenge, alternative phrasing. However, so far, no progress.

The Way Forward

If Labour and Reform UK want to avoid the same fate, the respective organizations should understand the Tories’ mistakes on social mobility; that equal opportunity talk is one thing, but actual achievement of more equal results is much harder. The UK’s persistently low social mobility remains the central problem for our country, with youth unable to get a proper professional launch, those working hard in occupations with minimal progress after the rent has been paid, and citizens throughout the UK without any genuine belief their children will be able to do improve in life than they have.

Politicians can talk about fairer opportunities however much they like. However, which party has the party that has the comprehensive policy agenda on equal opportunity? I observe no such party. Whoever gets there first, wins. Not just for their organization, but, significantly, for a entire nation that has never needed fair chances so badly.